Imagination Is More Important Than Knowledge Essay

The sum or range of what has been perceived, discovered or learned is what every dictionary or scientist would answer when one would ask them to define noesis. Imagination, is what these scientists and dictionaries would answer when they were given the app atomic number 18nt motion to state one word on the following The faculty of imagining, or of forming rational images or c at one timepts of what is not actu solelyy present to the senses. In 1929, Albert brainiac was brave enough to compare these two to each other afterwards which he came to the conclusion that supposition would be more grand in life than association, for companionship is limited.But when one were to consult anyone or anything on this statement, he would find thither is no clear support to construct conceivers words for granted. Nor is there any clear foe to question the above express. However, when one would be served with this statement after having pick out Lagemaats book he would immediately sta rt doubting brain and his views generating some opinion-worthy knowledge issues. For I am too, a reader of Lagemaats book, I rumpnot completely agree or deny his views asking myself how we nookie possibly aver on our conception without knowledge as a medium to support it.Or to what extent we, without any knowledge, would take our imagination for granted and thus consider our own imagination knowledge in one way or another. As stated above, even a claim made by one of the most talented mathematicians, usher out fork over its validity taking into consideration. By stating that imagination is more grave in social life than knowledge, solely by reflexion that our case for knowledge are limited would not suffice.The main question Lagemaat and many another(prenominal) of his followers would ask Einstein is in what way we can rely on our imagination in daily life without knowledge as a medium to support it or to what extent imagination makes us blind to knowledge and thus cons tipates us back in veridical life. For years people practised to think the b exclusively was flat. This was due to everyone imagining the earth as a flat square of which you could fall by. How else can we adhere on the earth if it wouldnt be flat? would welcome been the commonalty thing to think at the time.Humanity did not know what physical body the earth had as they had no tools to either go to outer set or observe other planets and the force of gravity. Due to this leave out of knowledge the only when tool they had was their imagination. People at that time came to a wide accepted conclusion of the earth creationness flat and you universe able to fall take out it into the everlasting darkness there being no life whatsoever. By saying imagination is more important that knowledge Einstein suggests we go back to these measure of unleashed imagination and forget our look for for the absolute truth.In my point of view, this would be a major policy change in our c urrent progress. For example, people that concept the earth was flat, also thought you could fall off it and therefore always had set boundaries and did not have the guts to explore more of the manhood solely driven by the fear of falling off. This led to the exploration of other continents being slow by a huge heart of time. Going back to the times of our imagination playing a role in our daily decisions would sort of frankly mean the same as us evolving back into the animals we once were as there would be nothing that distinguishes us from them.So can we trust our imagination if we do not have any knowledge to support it? No we cannot, we are humans and that is what separates us from any universal predator, we have knowledge. Another major loophole in Einsteins reason out is that in a world where we would not have any knowledge, and where we were left hand with imagination, our points of view would automatically be widely accepted and according to Lagemaats book, our imagi nation could then be seen as knowledge although this knowledge not being necessarily true(a).This completely neglects Einsteins words in the way that he states we do not need knowledge when we have imagination, but as I said before, all imagination does in that case is take up the position of knowledge neglecting the whole pop the question of imagination. An idea I used earlier on, the thought of the earth being flat. Not only did the wrong view on the earth being flat contribute to human kind thinking they could fall off and thus uphold important developments for many years, it also filled up the place of our lacking knowledge.What Im nerve-wracking to say is that because of our lack of knowledge we assumed something to be true solely based on our imagination. Thus considering it as knowledge. This type of thinking does not contribute to imagination being the way it was supposed to be The faculty of imagining, or of forming mental images or concepts of what is not actually prese nt to the senses. In basic mathematics which even Einstein should be able to follow, when A equals B and B equals C, A is equal to C.When imagination and knowledge are both said to lead to the view of the earth being round, knowledge and imagination are equal to each other. Thus stating that something is more important than its equal, is something ridiculous and only possible in the play Animal farm. Writing this bear witness made me, as an ordinary human, start to question the vast amount of knowledge I get served every day at school. If there was a way for me to actually find out whether something is really true, I would do it. Sadly I do not have these capabilities and all I can do is rely on the teachers words.But as I said before, these could very well be based on nothing but mere imagination and be completely wrong. It is only now that I start to see in what ways Lagemaat is right when he says how knowledge can be interpret and should be questioned at the same time. It was said that stating imagination was more important than knowledge eventually would lead into us making very mistaken assumptions and decisions in daily due to our knowledge of what is said to be true and what is not, would be lost completely and we would only base our decisions on our own insight and imagination.It was also said that Einstein was very wrong in saying that imagination was more important than knowledge as all imagination would do in that case was to replace knowledge, neglecting the whole pattern of imagination. Abstract The subject on this essay is related to Einsteins interview in 1929 in which he stated that imagination was more important than knowledge. in the essay itself I will be trying to argue why Einstein was in the wrong by saying the above said.By saying imagination is more important than knowledge, Einstein is basically saying that we as humans would be better off living in a world where we did not keep ourselves energetic with our everlasting hunger tow ards knowledge, but in a world where we would use our imagination instead of knowledge to reason for our decisions in daily life. I will try to disprove this by saying that in world without any knowledge, all imagination essentially would do, was to take up the place of knowledge because our imagination could then be argued to be knowledge as it is widely accepted amongst a large group of people in society.Furthermore there is the argument of human kind not being able to solely base their ideas and thoughts on imagination as this would only lead wrong insight as to how someone can wrap up with a certain situation and will with no doubt hold us up in our search for progress. This has been backed up by an example on human kind in the time they thought the earth was flat and as George Santayana said those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to extract it.