Distance Time Walking Relationship Experimentation

physical science Lab Report Distance beat Walking human relationship Experimentation For Mr. Williams SPH3U1-02 Sept. 13/10 scripted by Dong Chang, Gloria Chan, Sanjay Tanirige, and Waleed Shehzad Image credits Distance fourth dimension Walking Relationship Experimentation use The purpose of this experiment is to determine the measure of duration in seconds that it hook ons to walk a infinite of 84 bars on the running track. In addition, the soul that is the nearly trustworthy to perform this interrogation will take aim to be determined. Hypothesis We hypothesize that it will take approximately 103. 7 seconds to run the 84 pulse of track by an medium soul. This grade was derived from the average patch that it takes to walk matchless metre from the person with the most average walking speed out of the group. Procedure Materials and Apparatus Metre Stick manner Part A Finding most reliable pram 1. Place the metre stick on a sufficient space on the ground wit h some distance before and after it. let the zero metre mark be the issueing clip. 2. Start walking some distance before the origin (in the negative x-axis area).When the persons stride is all(prenominal) over the origin, the stopwatch is experienceed. The person will keep on walking and maintain the same speed and heading with no acceleration until they have walked some distance past the 1 metre mark. Stop the stopwatch once the persons stride is over the 1 metre mark. 3. Record the time that it takes to perform the action of walking 1 metre. Repeat maltreat 2 two more times so that you have three trials. Find the average time that it took the person to walk the 1 metre. 4. Repeat Steps 1-3 for each member of the roup. 5. Find the average that it takes for all members of the group to walk 1 metre by adding their averages and dividing by the amount of people in the group. stop watch with accuracy of 1/100 seconds Pre-marked area 84 metres long Distance Time Walking Relation ship Experimentation 6. The person that has the closest personalised average to the group average will be the most reliable walker for the group. Part B Finding the time that it takes to walk 84 metres 1. Mark the 84 metre track with the start and the finish. 2.Using the most reliable walker found in Part A, start walking some distance before the start line in order to achieve a constant velocity and have zero acceleration. Start the stopwatch when the persons stride is over the start line, and stop the stopwatch when the persons stride is over the finish line. 3. Record the time that it takes the person to walk the 84 metre length of track. Observations Record of the amount of time in seconds for a person to walk one metre. Walker Time 1 (seconds) 0. 90 0. 93 1. 08 1. 28 Time 2 (seconds) 1. 23 1. 16 1. 10 1. 08 Time 3 (seconds) 1. 6 1. 16 1. 18 1. 18 Time Average (seconds) 1. 13 1. 08 1. 12 1. 18 Dong Chang Gloria Chan Sanjay Tantirige Waleed Shahzad Therefore, the entireness ave rage of everyones time to walk one metre is (1. 13s+1. 08s+1. 12s+1. 18s)/4 =4. 51s/4 =1. 275s ?1. 3 seconds The person with the closest personal average is Dong Chang, with an average time of 1. 13 seconds.Therefore, he is the most reliable to run the test. Distance Time Walking Relationship Experimentation The average time of the most reliable person to walk one metre. Walker Dong Chang Time (seconds) 1. 21 1. 37 1. 19 1. 5 1. 17 1. 28 1. 18 1. 12 1. 21 1. 25 Therefore the average of the time to walk one metre is 1. 233 seconds. To bode the time it takes to walk 84 metres Let x be the estimated time to walk 84 metres x=time*distance x=1. 233 seconds * 84 metres x=103. 572 seconds x ? 103. 57 seconds Therefore we estimate it would take 103. 57 seconds in order to walk 84 metres. Actual result of test to walk 84 metres 106. 75 seconds Distance Time Walking Relationship Experimentation Percent Deviation of Test (experimental value theoretical value)/theoretical value * 100% (106. 5 s-103. 57s)/103. 57s*100% =(3. 18s/103. 57s)*100% ?3. 07% Therefore the deviation is 3. 07% away from the hypothesis. Percent deviance of Trials (maximum deviance in measurement)/average measurement * 100% (1. 37s-1. 12s)/1. 233s*100% =(0. 25s/1. 233s)*100% ?20. 3% Therefore the difference between the trials was 20. 3% Analysis 1. a) How did you choose the walker? We first had each person walk 1 metre three times each and timed them. An average time was assigned to each person based on their performance.Then we found the average that it takes for all members of the group to walk 1 metre by adding their personal averages and dividing by the amount of people in the group. The person that has the closest personal average to the group average will be the most reliable walker for the group because they are the most average. b) How did you designing your classroom trials? We placed the metre stick beside the straight surface of the wall so that the walker nooky walk perpendicular to i t as to not have any change in direction while conduction the trials.We heap the 0 metre point of the ruler as the origin, and that was where we would start timing and we set the 1 metre point to where we would stop timing. The walker would start walking before the origin so they can maintain a constant velocity and have zero acceleration. When their stride is over the origin, we would start timing, and then their stride Distance Time Walking Relationship Experimentation is over the 1 metre mark, we would stop timing. We did this three times each for every group member to find who was the most reliable walker, and ten times more for the most reliable walker. . a) How did your classroom trials approximate the final hitch? Our classroom trials help us obtain a proper hypothesis that was extremely close to our final test during the final verification.By using mathematical models and calculations with real world small scale measurements, we were able to predict the aftermath of the e xperiment passel to approximately 3% off. However, such trials seem mundane for such a downcast scale experiment which would probably have been done a lot faster if the final verification was done earlier. ) Who was the most reliable walker? Why? Dong Chang was the most reliable walker because his personal average time to walk 1 metre of distance is the closest to the groups total average to walk 1 metre. On average, the total group took 1. 275 seconds to walk 1 metre, with Dongs time of 1. 30 seconds average the closest. 3. a) How accurate was your estimate? Our estimate was very accurate and only presented a 3. 07% deviation (see observations for calculations) from the final verification time. b) Area your results reliable to science?Our results are reliable to science imputable to the good design of our trials and experiments. We had a 3. 07% error, which is less than the 5% that would deem our results acceptable to science. Conclusion In physics, motion is a change in locatio n or position of an object with respect to time. In this experiment, the walker exerts motion in order to change their position down a track. We were able to estimate the amount of time that it takes one to travel a certain distance with a set of scaled down trials. Distance Time Walking Relationship Experimentation